Last night was a remarkable moment. I guess whoever watched the live debate last night could make their own presumption on who is the winner of the debate, based on the points tendered, not on personal attack. Despite facing police interrogation today, DSAI seemed to be calm and bubbly, as opposed to the scurrilous and mouth-foaming Shabby. No wonder some Malaysian considered DSAI as the best orator in Malaysia. He spoke eloquently and the formula presented by him was convincing, which are:-
1) Savings in government expenditure, including the problems of leakage (as he referred to as 'kebocoran'.)
2) Reducing the standby capacity in energy production from 40% to 20% by the Independent Power Producer (IPP).
3) Savings from the special dividend which will be given by Petronas, amounting to RM6 billion (DSAI suggested to save RM 1 Billion).
According to him, the government need to save up RM5 billion to sustain the subsidy and offers RM0.50 cut from the current petrol price.
DSAI had made a good job. He revealed the methods to reduce the oil price from the beginning of the debate, whereas the Shabby kept crapping on the economic recession, blaming the global situation(war in Iraq, possibility of attack in Iran and high demand by China & India). He even flashback to situation in 1974, where DSAI had lead a parade during Allahyarham Tun Razak's reign. Come on laa..This is not a room for personal attack. The speaker/mediator was biased as well. He did mentioned earlier that any personal attack would not be tolerated, but when Shabby go against the rule, he just kept silent.
During the second round, Shabby explained that if the Government keep on giving subsidy, it would benefit the giant company such as Shell,Esso which are operating here. He suggested that instead of giving subsidy, it would be better if the government gives money straightaway to its rakyat. (Is there any sign right now that they are willing to give money to the people?*Lol*). He even fooled himself by comparing Malaysia to Norway, which gives less subsidy, but their country has less corruption compared to Malaysia. DSAI later countered his statement, by stating that Norway's per capita income is 10 times higher than us(It's true, I checked in Wiki today, Norwegian enjoys third-highest GDP per capita in the world). The audience then applauded.
DSAI later explained that Malaysia's net profit for oil production is among the top 100 in the world. When the panel kept reiterating that Petronas contribute a huge sum of profit to our country, DSAI sarcastically said that he did not want to touch on Petronas, instead he wants to question on the funds which had been given to government.
The panel reminiscenced the fuel hike in 2006, where the government had saved 4.3 billion and promised to upgrade the public transport, but they only used 834.75 million out of the saving. The left-over of the money had been questioned. This time, the government can saved up to 13 billion. So what's the government plan for this huge some of saving? Apparently, Shabby twisted his answers, by directing to Venezuela, which the fuel price is 10 cent but their inflation rate is up to 30% and same goes on Iran. He didn't really answered the panel's question. He misled the audience to the recent embarassing concert during the oil hike protest. DSAI brilliantly countered his statement again, claiming that our inflation rate goes higher recently(in June, it's 6%). So, by comparing the ration of oil hike:inflation rate, to Venezuela and Iran, our is even worse!
When it comes to the final question, DSAI asked Shabby, why the hike is so drastic?Why the government broke their promise before the election of not raising the fuel price? Once again, he didn't answered the question. He ostensibly drawed us back to the reformation in 1974 led by DSAI, attacked DSAI personally like he had did during his introduction statement. Poor him, he had drained out of facts and ideas to answer and counter DSAI.
Shabby later questioned DSAI what would happen if Malaysia has run out of oil sources one day, will the PR continues to give subsidy or the price will raise up drastically? First few seconds, DSAI bashed him of not utilizing the opportunity to discuss about oil hike, instead misused the room for personal attack. *Lol*. He later stated that the oil will only run out in 2015 if Petronas stopped their work. He went further by defending Petronas, he only condemned the present government for their inefficient management of the funds. Yesterday, Petronas announced that they will give 6 billion as special dividend to the government. He suggested that the government can use 1 billion out of the dividend to bear the subsidy.
DSAI, although he is not an economic-graduate, he was equipped with facts and figures relating to economic statistic. He revealed to the audience that with every increase of 1 dollar, we will get a profit up to 360 million, and thus we have a huge sum of benefit. Yes, we are the importer and not among the top 20 (as mentioned by Shabby), of course with the current global situation, there would be an increase, but not so drastic until it burdens the rakyat. Shabby, on the other way round, is prepared on the perspective of 'personal attack' and 'sarcastic remarks' only. He came out with less facts and figures compared to DSAI. I bet most of the audience cracked a laughter when he mentioned that "Petronas hebat kerana UMNO". He even fooled himself with stupid jokes mentioning about minyak attar.. Haha,Shabby, now one whole nation know you can be a good comedian, replacing Mr Bean.
The best suggestion from the Panel is that "DSAI ...tak perlulah jadi PM, nasihat sajalah kat kerajaan sekarang..". DSAI sarcastically mentioned that he was there because he is not a PM, and even willing to give suggestions for the government, but is there any willingness on part of our present government to accept his ideas?
Shabby also seems to be lack of approach to defend the government. He keep reiterating the word "populist" and the phrase "unpopular decision". Well, they had ran out of weapon, those words are the only shields to protect them.
Though I preferred DSAI, I would like tender an impartial view here. I personally think that DSAI had given out good points, but he failed to elaborate his convincing views on how to tailored up with the economic recession if we reduced our oil price in this current global recession (Shabby pointed out good question here). Another problem, what if we had ultimately run out of the oil sources during 2015, would he continues to give subsidy or reduces the price drastically? He did not give a lengthy explanation concerning this matter at the end of the debate.
All in all, even the online poll in Malaysiakini proved that DSAI's voters had outnumbered Shabby. Obviously, the BN government had ran out of the high credibility leaders. The left-overs of their supporters are their MPs and loyal supporters (pakcik pakcik dan makcik makcik) who are not exposed to the alternative medias and the ICT. The young generations are wiser to judge who are the better and potential leaders.
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Monday, July 14, 2008
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Plaid Shirt
Was tagged by Miss Nayrell Musings
Well, I saw this one girl in her blog clad up in this 'plaid shirt' before.(never know it is called as plaid shirt until Ainna mentioned about it..haha!). I only refer to it as checked-print shirt. So when I was goofing around the KB Mall back in trimester break, I saw this shirt on the piles of RM10 case. The girl in that blog and her shirt came across my mind all of a sudden. I also personally think that the check-printed shirt depicts the 'indie's darling'. So, I picked up this shirt without any hesitation cos it's so cheap and the color is nice (combination of blue,yellow, and orange).
I bought the belt above at RM2 from a thrift stall@Pasar Pagi Shah Alam. I'm a cheapskate, so I do always love cheap stuffs and lowest bargain. Mind again that my brand-new plaid shirt is only RM10. I'm not a fashion victim, I only hunt for cheap-but-nice fashion items. I quote a verse from 'Pork and Beans' by Weezer that definitely pictures me well, hehe..
...I ain't gonna wear the clothes that you like
I'm finally dandy with the me inside
One look in the mirror and I'm tickled pink
I don't give a hoot about what you think..
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Pork and Beans from The Red Album
Weezer was back!With their 6th Album-The Red Album (another album with color title after the 'blue' and 'green' albums). They released their album on 3rd July but poor them, it was leaked out before the release on the internet, and their single, 'Pork and Beans' was uploaded on p2p software like iMesh and Limewire.
When I first listened to the singalong melody of the Pork and Beans, it reminds me back to the glory days of Weezer, the chunka-chunka guitar hooks swing me back to 90's, as good as their Pinkerton, Blue, and Green albums. It almost resembling the El Scorcho or Buddy Holly. Yea, I was the number 1 fan of =w=, I listened to the Buddy Holly when I was at the age of 13(borrowed my uncle's cd at that time), and I was like mesmerized to their catchy-tunes and brilliant lyrics! Since then I started to look out for their other songs, where later I found out that Island in The Sun, Butterfly, and O'Girlfriend were magnificient too when I was in Form 4.
The picture above is the cover of the album. You can see that the band members are wearing the Village People costumes. Rivers Cuomo seemed to be getting older and more matured, but his wired-glass was never changed! His eccentric geekness rocks the socks through a clever and irrestisible lyrics and cranked-up amplifier!
No one can denies, Cuomo is a genius powerpop persona. Graduated from Harvard University, he was conferred a phi beta kappa (most prestigious honors for arts and science undergraduate in America). I personally admired him, as much as my honorable respect for the Icelandic Bjork.
Their v/clip for Pork and Beans is a must-watch one!It's so hilarious, featuring many YouTube celebrities. You'll definitely crack a laughter when you see the video!
I keep on repeating the song today. It's loud, very radio-friendly,till I can't resist to play it again and again. My cousin had just send The Greatest Man that Ever Lived, another hit from the Red Album. I cant make a review on it yet, since I had just received it and played it for the first time.
Overall, Weezer had emerged back from their stagnation period, during Maladroit and Make Believe. They're ready to rock your socks now!
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Massive Reform: For Better or For Worst?
Yesterday's article in The Star was so imperative. The issue was taken from The Economist, written meticulously by Baraddan Kupusamy, criticizing the changes by Pak Lah. In his article, the reforms made by Pak Lah was compared to Mikhail Gorbachev (the last head of state of the USSR), whereby his reforms had overthrowed the Old Soviet regime in 1991. I was so eager to know about this guy. So, I 'wiki' and 'googled' up his name. There I found the lights out of my curiousity.
Gorbachev introduced Glasnost, which promotes openness, transparency and freedom of information in the Soviet Union government. Obviously, the traits of his reforms are tantamount to the positive changes by Pak Lah after the catastrophic-poll. He promoted openness and transparency by appointing two outspoken Senators, Datuk Zaid Ibrahim and Datuk Shahrir Samad (well-known for his critic-minded during CheDet's reign). These two ministers had announced sudden reforms by establishing ACA, Royal Police Commission, and Judicial Appointment Commission. The rakyat welcomed these establishments as more and more 'skeletons in the closet' were revealed. More high-rank officers were detained for corruption, like yesterday, a high-rank officer from KTMB was interrogated for his mishap. In last few days news, a PO was detained when he forced a girl to perform oral-sex and subsequently raped her during investigation for a traffic-offence. The more 'interesting', allegations by Justice Ian Chin against the former Prime Minister. Like I said, more 'skeletons' popped out from the closet, more defects were discovered. I tried to link these with comments regarding comparison to Mikhail Gorbachev that oversaw the changes as the 'murderer' to the Soviet Regime. Well, changes can be for a better impact or for worst. It depends on how the rakyat accepting the changes, and the fidelity of the reforms itself. If rakyat can tolerate with the 'hidden skeleton' that had just popped-out, yes, it will be for better.
But if vice versa, ughh.. I won't say anything. There's an 'alligator' outside that curtails the expression of my thoughts. I won't blame the S.A 1948 and D.A 1957..MAYBE there is a good reason...yea...MAYBE.
Thaksin came across my mind while I was writing this post. He was overthrowed by a military junta, where during his reign, corruptions were at the peak, and hostility towards a free press (contemplating over RPK all of a sudden). It only came across my mind..I'm not ready to elaborate on it...I'm a 'potential-predator', who feared the 'alligator'.
Ohh...Positive-thinking! Towards a free press, I was contended that Harakah was already allowed to be published twice a week. This is a BETTER reform.
Gorbachev introduced Glasnost, which promotes openness, transparency and freedom of information in the Soviet Union government. Obviously, the traits of his reforms are tantamount to the positive changes by Pak Lah after the catastrophic-poll. He promoted openness and transparency by appointing two outspoken Senators, Datuk Zaid Ibrahim and Datuk Shahrir Samad (well-known for his critic-minded during CheDet's reign). These two ministers had announced sudden reforms by establishing ACA, Royal Police Commission, and Judicial Appointment Commission. The rakyat welcomed these establishments as more and more 'skeletons in the closet' were revealed. More high-rank officers were detained for corruption, like yesterday, a high-rank officer from KTMB was interrogated for his mishap. In last few days news, a PO was detained when he forced a girl to perform oral-sex and subsequently raped her during investigation for a traffic-offence. The more 'interesting', allegations by Justice Ian Chin against the former Prime Minister. Like I said, more 'skeletons' popped out from the closet, more defects were discovered. I tried to link these with comments regarding comparison to Mikhail Gorbachev that oversaw the changes as the 'murderer' to the Soviet Regime. Well, changes can be for a better impact or for worst. It depends on how the rakyat accepting the changes, and the fidelity of the reforms itself. If rakyat can tolerate with the 'hidden skeleton' that had just popped-out, yes, it will be for better.
But if vice versa, ughh.. I won't say anything. There's an 'alligator' outside that curtails the expression of my thoughts. I won't blame the S.A 1948 and D.A 1957..MAYBE there is a good reason...yea...MAYBE.
Thaksin came across my mind while I was writing this post. He was overthrowed by a military junta, where during his reign, corruptions were at the peak, and hostility towards a free press (contemplating over RPK all of a sudden). It only came across my mind..I'm not ready to elaborate on it...I'm a 'potential-predator', who feared the 'alligator'.
Ohh...Positive-thinking! Towards a free press, I was contended that Harakah was already allowed to be published twice a week. This is a BETTER reform.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)